OILFIELD RFQ
EquipmentCalculatorsGuides
Submit RFQ
Home/Resources/Single-Joint Elevators: SJH and D-SJX Row-Specific Selection

Selection & Specification

Single-Joint Elevators: SJH and D-SJX Row-Specific Selection

By OILFIELD RFQ SOURCING•October 23, 2026•4 min read
tubular handling toolsSJHD-SJXsingle-joint elevatorsshort-ton rating
AI-generated tubular-handling category illustration; not a photograph of NOV SJH or D-SJX
AI-generated category reference. It is not a photograph of a specific manufacturer or exact product model.

On this page

  1. Separate four questions before comparing elevators
  2. Use a named row, not a merged family range
  3. A document matrix with four closure points
  4. Handle document conflicts without repairing them
  5. Fictional desk review: a rating attached to the wrong identity
  6. Keep other handling equipment on separate lines

View the model-specific values, conditions and sources

Separate four questions before comparing elevators

A single-joint elevator enquiry should resolve model identity, tubular fit, stated rating and the boundary of the offered assembly as separate questions. A familiar product name cannot answer all four. Nor can a larger catalogue load number cure an unidentified jaw configuration.

This guide organizes a purchasing document review. It does not specify a lifting arrangement, a rigging method or an operating procedure. The responsible qualified reviewer and equipment manufacturer must address the intended application using the documents for the actual assembly.

Use a named row, not a merged family range

The NOV Manual Single Joint Elevators sheet lists the first SJH tubing-and-drill-pipe row at 5 short tons for 2-3/8 to 4-1/2 in tubular sizes. The D-SJX Heavy Duty table separately lists 12 short tons and 3-1/2 to 7-1/2 in.

Keep each size interval beside its model and row. Neither is a whole-string lifting rating. A catalogue interval also does not identify the jaw or insert supplied with an individual offer. These references provide a concrete starting identity, not acceptance of a complete handling system.

A document matrix with four closure points

Use the following matrix to prevent an answered dimension question from hiding an unanswered application question.

Closure pointBuyer information to identifySupplier document responseReason to keep the item open
Model and rowExact catalogue reference requestedOffered model, revision and configuration identityOnly a broad family name is returned
Tubular fitRelevant body, upset or coupling geometryMatched jaw or insert configuration and its referenceOnly a broad nominal size interval is supplied
Stated ratingIntended duty and required review responsibilityModel-specific rating in its original unitA value from another model or an unexplained unit appears
Assembly boundaryComplete equipment or identified replacement partsIncluded components, exclusions and applicable drawingAccessories are assumed to be common across models

Give each unanswered field an owner and a required response. Do not collapse all four closure points into a single supplier compliance tick. A response can be internally consistent yet still lack the information needed for the intended duty.

Handle document conflicts without repairing them

Manufacturer sheets can contain several model columns and a mixture of narrative descriptions and table rows. When a response cites a broad narrative range but names a narrower row, ask which configuration is actually being offered. Do not combine the broadest endpoints from different places into a new range.

Likewise, keep short tons distinct from metric tonnes. If two representations disagree, retain the original documents and request clarification against the named row. An unmarked conversion or silently corrected number makes it harder for the next reviewer to identify what the manufacturer actually stated.

For these references, the selected load unit is short ton. No conclusion about certification, inspection acceptance or complete-system capacity follows from the model designation. Those questions need their own applicable documents and review.

Fictional desk review: a rating attached to the wrong identity

Consider a fictional offer headed SJH that attaches a D-SJX load value. Its size statement is copied from another catalogue column, and the quotation describes the included parts only as “standard jaws.”

This is not an offer that the buyer should repair by selecting a conservative number. The model, range and component identity are unresolved together. Request a corrected offer with one identified assembly, one supporting row and a specific jaw or insert reference. Keep the conflicting version available alongside the response.

A second fictional offer might return a coherent SJH row but omit the intended-duty confirmation. That offer has a different gap: its identity is clearer, but the application review remains open. Recognizing the difference allows a targeted question instead of sending the same generic checklist to every bidder.

Keep other handling equipment on separate lines

If the project also needs slips or power tongs, create separate technical lines for those items. An elevator's rating does not establish a slip capacity or a tong torque, and a shared tubular diameter does not prove cross-component compatibility. Replacement parts likewise need the installed assembly identity and applicable part reference.

Use the tubular handling reference to preserve the selected rows, then submit the unresolved matrix through the handling-equipment RFQ Builder. Request quantity, included components, document scope and explicit deviations. The image is an AI-generated category illustration, not a verified SJH or D-SJX photograph. No catalogue reference here establishes current stock or manufacturer authorization.

Referenced model data

ModelParameterReference valueConditions and source
NOV SJH / 2-3/8 to 4-1/2 in tubing and drill-pipe rowListed elevator rated load5 short ton

NOV SJH / 2-3/8 to 4-1/2 in tubing and drill-pipe row; only this printed row is referenced. Load unit is short ton, not metric tonne. Single-joint equipment reference, never a whole-string lifting rating or acceptance of the complete lifting system. Exact jaw/insert configuration and intended duty require manufacturer confirmation. The first SJH tubing-and-drill-pipe row is used, not the other SJH size rows.

Page 1, SJH leftmost table, first row

Revision RigDoc 97077894 Rev. 1 · Checked 2026-10-23

NOV SJH / 2-3/8 to 4-1/2 in tubing and drill-pipe rowListed tubular size range2-3/8 to 4-1/2 in

NOV SJH / 2-3/8 to 4-1/2 in tubing and drill-pipe row; only this printed row is referenced. Load unit is short ton, not metric tonne. Single-joint equipment reference, never a whole-string lifting rating or acceptance of the complete lifting system. Exact jaw/insert configuration and intended duty require manufacturer confirmation. The first SJH tubing-and-drill-pipe row is used, not the other SJH size rows.

Page 1, SJH leftmost table, first row, Size column

Revision RigDoc 97077894 Rev. 1 · Checked 2026-10-23

NOV D-SJX Heavy Duty / 3-1/2 to 7-1/2 in rowListed elevator rated load12 short ton

NOV D-SJX Heavy Duty / 3-1/2 to 7-1/2 in row; only this printed row is referenced. Load unit is short ton, not metric tonne. Single-joint equipment reference, never a whole-string lifting rating or acceptance of the complete lifting system. Exact jaw/insert configuration and intended duty require manufacturer confirmation. Metric load figures differ between prose and table and are deliberately not reconciled.

Page 1, D-SJX Heavy Duty table, 3-1/2 to 7-1/2 in row

Revision RigDoc 97077894 Rev. 1 · Checked 2026-10-23

NOV D-SJX Heavy Duty / 3-1/2 to 7-1/2 in rowListed tubular size range3-1/2 to 7-1/2 in

NOV D-SJX Heavy Duty / 3-1/2 to 7-1/2 in row; only this printed row is referenced. Load unit is short ton, not metric tonne. Single-joint equipment reference, never a whole-string lifting rating or acceptance of the complete lifting system. Exact jaw/insert configuration and intended duty require manufacturer confirmation. Metric load figures differ between prose and table and are deliberately not reconciled.

Page 1, D-SJX Heavy Duty table, Size column

Revision RigDoc 97077894 Rev. 1 · Checked 2026-10-23

Authoritative references

  • NOV Manual Single Joint Elevatorschecked 2026-10-23

On this page

  1. Separate four questions before comparing elevators
  2. Use a named row, not a merged family range
  3. A document matrix with four closure points
  4. Handle document conflicts without repairing them
  5. Fictional desk review: a rating attached to the wrong identity
  6. Keep other handling equipment on separate lines

Related Products

Tubular Handling Tools: Single-Joint Elevator ReferencesHydraulic CatwalksCompletion Sliding Sleeves

Preparing a Technical RFQ?

Send the specification, quantity, destination and target price so the open technical points can be identified.

Contact Us

RFQ preparation tools

Structured RFQ BuilderEquipment ParametersAPI Standards NavigatorProcurement Glossary

More in Selection & Specification

BOP Control Selection: Pressure Ratings and Usable Fluid

4 min read

Gas Generator Bid Review: Fuel Basis Is Not Electrical Output

3 min read

Power Tong Capacity Is Not Connection Make-Up Torque

3 min read

OILFIELD RFQ

Technical references, practical calculations and structured equipment requests for the oilfield industry.

Equipment

  • Wellhead & Pressure Control
  • Drilling & Downhole Tools
  • Mud Pump & Rig Spares
  • Sourcing & Export

Resources

  • Buyer Guides
  • Calculators & RFQ Builder
  • Equipment Reference
  • API Standards Navigator
  • FAQ
  • Procurement Glossary
  • Solutions
  • About Us
  • Contact

Contact

  • Submit RFQ online
  • China

© 2026 OILFIELD RFQ SOURCING. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy|Terms of Service